Showing posts sorted by date for query Israel. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query Israel. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Friday, March 29, 2024

You Are Right in Saying I Am A King

Pilate then went back inside the palace, summoned Jesus and asked him, "Are you the king of the Jews?" "Is that your own idea," Jesus asked, "or did others talk to you about me?" "Am I a Jew?" Pilate replied. "It was your people and chief priests who handed you over to me. What is it you have done?" Jesus said, "My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jews. But now my kingdom is from another place." "You are a king, then!" said Pilate. Jesus answered, "You are right in saying I am a king. In fact, for this reason I was born, and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone on the side of truth listens to me" (John 18:33-37).

Who would have thought that anti-semitic non-Christians would start using the phrase "Christ is King" as a way to intimidate and slander Jewish people?

Not me, that's for sure.

Imagine my surprise when on one of my regular podcasts, for an entire hour, this was the topic of discussion.

The host explained how Candace Owens, recently separated from Ben Shapiro's "The Daily Wire" used the phrase in a post on X back in November 2023. She was called out for anti-semitism by other members of the Daily Wire. Some of them posted about how the phrase is anti-semitic, and that Jesus' name should never be used to slander the race from which Jesus came, God's chosen people, the Jews. I think Andrew Klavan's response is worth reading/hearing

For sure Jesus' name should never be used to demean others. To do so is to violate the Second Commandment. But it also got me thinking. The leftist media is going to have a field day showing hypocrites who call themselves Christians who are taking Jesus' name in vain, using it for the vile purpose of trying to disparage another human being because of their so-called race. It won't be long before there are stories in the mainstream media asserting that saying "Christ is King" is hate speech, and orthodox Christianity is a right wing hate group.

First, let's get this out of the way right off the bat. Anti-semitism is wrong. Like racism of all other varieties, anti-semitism is sin. Christianity, in fact, doesn't recognize the concept of race as it is understood in the American socio-political context.

As trite as it may sound, the saying is true: there is only one race - the human race. All people, being descended from our common parents Adam and Eve, are all part of the same human family. We are called to love the Lord our God with all our heart, soul, strength, and mind, and to love our neighbor as ourself. To hate him because he is of a different ethnicity than we are is the opposite of that command, and therefore we must repent. Moreover, as St. Paul says to the Galatians, all of us who are a part of the body of Christ are united in a way that supercedes all earthly differences:

You are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise (Galatians 3:26-29).

In spite of this, some might be tempted to say that Christians should stop using the phrase "Christ is King" because it has been tainted with bigotry. The racist white supremacist Nick Fuentes has been using "Christ is King" in some of his speeches.

The impulse to not sound like these distasteful individuals, or to be associated with their evil movements is understandable. Indeed we should not want to sound like them. We must be careful, however, that we don't overcorrect and slip into doctrinal error because we don't want to be called racists.

More importantly, we must not let evil men steal from us our doctrine.

This is just another way for Satan to get us to be ashamed of the Gospel message. We must instead declare with St. Paul that we are not ashamed of the Gospel of Christ, because it is the power of God for the salvation of all who believe, first for the Jew, then for the Greek. Satan would like nothing more than to silence Christians from proclaiming the Gospel truth that Jesus, true God in human flesh, Savior of mankind, is King of the universe.

Despite who says it, or who it makes angry, and what their reasons are, Christ is, indeed, King. He has died for the sins of the world. He has risen from the dead for the justification of those who believe. And He will come again in glory, as King, to be our judge. We Christians are to proclaim this message of the cross, and that there is forgiveness of sins, life, and salvation for all who repent of their sin and believe in Christ.

No matter what, people are going to be offended by the Gospel. It is, as St. Paul says, a stumbling block to Jews, and foolishness to Gentiles. But to we who are being saved it is the power of God and the wisdom of God.

However, maintaining this doctrinal truth in America is not easy. It is difficult to walk the narrow road between the ditch of being labled an anti-semite on the one side, and denying what Christ says about Himself being the only way of salvation for all mankind on the other.

Ben Shapiro shared a post from Robert P. George on X which gets something very wrong regarding Christianity's teaching on Jews and Judaism, and illustrates just what the problem is. The post says:

"For Catholics and other Christians, Holy Week is a time of spiritual preparation for Easter. It is also a time to recall the rootedness of our faith in that of our 'elder brothers' -- the Jewish people, 'whose covenant with God is unbroken and unbreakable.'"

White supremacists saying "Christ is King" in order to encourage the defamation of Jewish people is wrong. That wrong, however, doesn't make what Ben Shapiro posted in response to this controversy true. We Christians must be careful not to go too far in the other direction and act as though we are part of the same religion, or worshipping the same God as the religious Jews. We are not, and we do not. God's special relationship with the physical nation of Israel ended with the coming of Jesus and their rejection of Him.

Jesus teaches plainly of the impending rejection of the nation of Israel by God (Judisch, 1978):

"Therefore I tell you that the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people who will produce it's fruit" (Matthew 21:43).

Jesus makes this point in His parable of the Great Banquet as well. The Great King prepared his banquet, but the invited guests rejected the invitation and refused to come. The servant reported this to the master, who sent the servant out to the streets and alleys of the town to invite the poor, the cripled, the blind, and the lame:

"'Sir,' the servant said, 'what you ordered has been done, but there is still room.' Then the master told his servant, 'Go out to the roads and country lanes and compel them to come in, so that my house will be full. I tell you, not one of those who were invited will get a taste of my banquet" (Luke 14:22-24).

God, the Great King, sent the invitation to His great banquet to His chosen guests through Moses and the prophets. John the Baptist came as the herald, announcing that the time had come. The kingdom of God, the preaching of Christ, was at hand. All the invited guests should come to the banquet (Kretzmann, 1921). But Israel, as a whole, rejected the invitation. Jesus turns from the Jews, though He longed to gather them as a hen gathers her chicks, because they refused to be gathered. He invites the spiritually blind, poor and lame, tax collectors, sinners, and Gentiles to fill His house.

In Christ all those who repent and believe the good news, Jew and Gentile alike, are united into one body, which is Christ's. Christ's Gospel is indeed the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes, first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. And, in Christ, we are Abraham's seed and part of the Israel of God where there is no Jew or Gentile, slave or free, male or female. We are heirs to God's promise of forgiveness, life, and eternal salvation in Jesus.

The good news is that Christ came to die as the propitiation for the sin of the whole world. That includes everybody, including Jewish people. He offers that forgiveness for sin, life, and salvation to all people through His word and by His sacraments. To say that the Jewish people have a special relationship with God because of their ethnic heritage is a false teaching. What is worse is that it makes people of Jewish heritage feel secure because of their blood line when they are outside of the body of Christ. It gives them hope where there is none, in their flesh. But Jesus says faith in Him is man's only hope:

"...Does this offend you? What if you see the Son of Man ascend to where he was before! The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and they are life. Yet there are some of you who do not believe (John 6:61-64).

Definitively Jesus declares:

"I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me," (John 14:6).

------------------------

Bibliography

Judisch, Douglas. 1978. "An Evaluation of Claims to the Charismatic Gifts." Grand Rapids: Baker Book House. The Purpose of the Prophetic Gifts, p. 43.

Kretzman, Paul E.. 1921. "Popular Commentary on the Bible: New Testament Vol. 1." St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, pp. 346-347.

Robinson, William C Harrison, Everett F., et. al., eds. 1999. "Wycliffe Dictionary of Theology." Church. Peabody: Hendrickson Pub.

Sunday, March 24, 2024

Thoughts on the Doctrine of Election

As a Confessional Lutheran living in what some in the Lutheran blogosphere have called the "desert of American Evangelicalism," one gets accustomed to being ignored. No one quite knows what to do with Confessional Lutherans. Consequently, we usually get left out of the debates, and our doctrine is not well-known. We look like Roman Catholics, most of the time. We talk about baptism a LOT, and how salvation comes only by the grace of God through faith in Jesus Christ alone. Most American Evangelicals don't know what to do with us, if we're even on their radar at all.

Mostly, we are not.

This is evident when the discussion turns to something like the doctrine of Election. You've got your Calvinists, and you've got your Arminians; your predestination people and your free will guys. Either God has predestined everybody for where they're going or we all have to make a decision for Jesus and pray the sinners prayer.

Then there are the Lutherans. We don't fit into either of those categories.

We acknowledge that man has free will, but only in matters that do not pertain to salvation. Where conversion is concerned, we acknowledge that scripture teaches we are dead in our trespasses and sins (Ephesians 2:1ff.).

We also understand that God has predestined the elect to salvation in Christ before the foundation of the world. However, - and here's where we lose the Calvinists - we acknowledge that scripture teaches that a believer can fall away.

Calvin wrote that salvation is not preached to all people equally. The reason why, he says, is a mystery. Calvin defines predestination as the doctrine that some people are chosen by God to be saved, and others are chosen by God to be damned. This is quite different from how the doctrine of election is understood from Holy Scripture by the Lutheran reformers. Calvin admits that this teaching might sound scary and confusing at first, but it is, in fact, "useful and pleasant." (Calvin, 1526) Calvin writes that the doctrine of election shows man that salvation is truly monergistic. To him, the fact that God gives salvation to some and withholds it from others, Calvin says, simultaneously glorifies God and humbles man. (Calvin, 1526)

Calvin and the Lutheran Confessions both agree that the doctrine of election is, in Calvin's words, "useful and pleasant"; that it is intended to be a comfort, and to showcase the glory of God. But Christianity does not teach fatalism. Fatalism is the idea that nothing you do makes any difference because everything is pre-ordained. Christian faith is knowing God works all things, even the ones we think are bad, for the good of those who love Him, who are called according to His purpose in Christ. And here we come to the first and greatest difference between a Reformed and a Confessional Lutheran understanding of election: it can only be understood in Christ.

Calvin says that God reveals His will to men, and that we must not seek that which God has kept hidden. Calvin says that we find the revealed will of God in God's word. This is true, and the Lutheran Confessions agree. Calvin, however, seems to go beyond what Scripture says when he teaches that God has created some men specifically for damnation.

To Calvin, God is the cause of salvation to those who are saved; God is also the cause of damnation to those who are damned. This is what Calvin means when he writes that all are not "created on equal terms." (Calvin, 1536) In other words, Calvin teaches that God created some people specifically to be saved, and other specifically to be damned. Those so created have no chance either to fall if they are the elect, or to be saved if they are the reprobate.

Calvin cites Deuteronomy 32:8-9 to show that God does not reveal the reason He saves certain people and damns others. As God declared to the Israelites through Moses, Calvin says, God chose the Israelites because He wanted to; it was not because of anything God saw in them, or that they merited God's favor. Calvin says that here God keeps the reason the elect are chosen a secret, but this isn't entirely true. God does indeed reveal how and why the elect are saved: they are saved by God's grace through faith in Christ alone.

Moreover, scripture also declares that the lost are damned because of their lack of faith, not because God predestined them to be lost and condemned.

When discussing eternal election, the Lutheran reformers make a distinction between God's eternal election and God's eternal foreknowledge. God's foreknowledge means simply that God sees and knows all things before they happen. Foreknowledge applies to all creatures. Election does not apply to all creatures. Election only applies to those people who are in Christ. (McCain, 2005)

God's eternal election simply means those whom God has predestined to salvation in Christ from before the foundation of the world. Election, therefore, does not include the wicked. On the contrary, it only includes the godly, i.e. those people who have faith in Christ. Those who are predestined to salvation are those who are in Christ.

Here we enter the territory of another fundamental difference between Reformed and Confessional Lutheran theology: paradox. Confessional Lutheran theologians do not feel the need to resolve paradox when it is found it Holy Scripture. Reformed theologians make the rational argument that if God chose one group of men to be saved, then that means he chose the remaining group of men to be damned by default. That is not, however, what the Bible says. In short, Scripture teaches the following paradox: 1) God wants all men to be saved and come to a knowledge of the truth; 2) God is completely responsible for working repentance and faith in men by the means of His word; 3) Some men reject God's gracious gift and are not saved; 4) Those men who are lost are responsible for their own damnation, not God.

Part of the problem is that Calvin does not seem to recognize that the lost are lost because of their own sin; because of their own failure to believe in Christ, and not because God decreed them to be reprobate. Consider the fact that Non-Israelites could become a part of the nation of Israel. People like Rahab the prostitute were accepted as part of God's chosen people, not because of their bloodline, but because of their faith. Again, consider Saul. He was the annointed king of Israel, yet he was rejected by God  because he was unfaithful.

Calvin sees the choosing of Israel by God as a sort of general election. The explanation he gives for why most of Israel fell away even though they were part of the elect nation and only a remnant remained is troubling. Calvin explains that, while God did elect the entire body of Jacob's descendants, He did not immediately give all of them the Holy Spirit. According to Calvin, this withholding of the Spirit is why most of elect Israel fell away and only a remnant was caused to persevere. (Calvin, 1536) 

Where Calvin found such a horrifying notion is anyone's guess. It does not come from Scripture.

But Calvin continues, asserting that God is not unjust to choose some men to reprobation. Indeed, He would not be unjust if that were the case. All men are, after all, in a fallen state. God would have been justified in destroying the entire fallen creation, and starting over again. But Calvin also ascribes man's corrupt and fallen state to God's will. (Calvin, 1536)

Scripture tells us that isn't the case. God is not the source of evil, nor is God the cause of sin. Rather, Adam's will and the will of the devil are the cause of mankinds fall, and the introduction of sin and death into creation.

God may not be the cause of man's fall into sin as Calvin says. God did, however, allow the Fall to happen. And, along with everything else, God works those things to the good of those elect in Christ.

Calvin says that God issues His call to faith by the preaching of the Gospel. According to Calvin, however, though the Gospel goes out to the elect and to the reprobate alike, God only makes it effectual in those whom He has elected. Those who are reprobate, therefore, do not have the opportunity or the ability to believe; God, according to His will, has rendered the power of the Gospel ineffective in them. (Calvin, 1536)

Predestination is not a trick. God does not say outwardly that salvation is for all people, but secretly not mean it. This would mean that God had two contradictory wills, which cannot be because Scripture tells us so. (McCain, 2005) God punishes such duplicity. He does not reward it.

God would indeed be a liar and a hypocrate if His invitation was extended to all people through His word, but secretly in His heart He knew there were some people He would damn anyway, no matter what. God condemns this type of wickedness (Psalm 5:9; 12:2-4). Man is, on the contrary, responsible for his own damnation by resisting and rejecting the Holy Spirit as He works through God's word.

God reveals His will by His call to preach the Gospel to all people. He works through that word to enlighten, convert, and save. The Gospel is the power of God for salvation; God wants men to receive, believe, and obey His word. Christ merited the redemption of the entire human race on the cross. Through word and sacrament Christ gives us the benefits of what He has merited. That is to say that the Holy Spirit working through those means works conversion; works repentance and faith in Christ for the forgiveness of sins in us. Moreover, the Spirit will justify, sanctify, and protect those in whom He has done such work if we do not abandon Christ and His Word. (McCain, 2005)

He will save eternally at the Resurrection on the Last Day those who persevere. ###


---


Works Cited

Calvin, John. 1536. "Institutes of the Christian Religion." Chapters 21-24. Christian Classics Ethereal Library. 
https://ccel.org/ccel/calvin/institutes/institutes.v.xxii.html.

McCain, Paul T., et. al., eds. 2005. "Concordia: The Lutheran Confessions. A Reader's Edition of the Book of Concord." First Edition. Formula of Concord, Solid Declaration XI. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House.

Thursday, July 6, 2023

The Paradox of Perseverance and Apostasy

Verbum Domini Manet in Aeternum
The Word of the Lord Endures Forever
The concept of justification by God’s grace through faith in Christ is central to Christian theology. Paul’s writings emphasize that believers are considered righteous by God through Christ’s sacrifice, despite their inherent sinfulness. This righteousness is imputed to believers through faith, a truth echoed in the faith of Old Testament saints like Abraham. At the same time, God’s word also teaches two paradoxical ideas: 1) that a person who is a believer in Christ can forfeit, or lose that faith, and 2) that God who works faith in men by means of God’s word will cause men to persevere in that faith.

According to Paul’s writings in Romans and Galatians, God justifies believers by reckoning or counting them as righteous, even though they are not inherently righteous.1 God does this not because of anything we do; his favor is unmerited. We are saved by God’s grace through faith in Christ because of His death and resurrection.2 God sees believers through the lens of Christ’s righteousness, despite the fact that we are sinful.3 The believer is called to actively strive against the sinful flesh,4 considering it as good as dead because of Christ’s crucifixion.5 This concept of justification through faith finds its foundation not only in the New Testament but also in the experiences of Old Testament believers. Consider Abraham: scripture affirms that Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness.6 Like Abraham, we believe, and God counts us righteous because of our faith. We are considered Abraham’s children by faith.7 Thus, the nature of justification highlights how God’s reckoning of righteousness extends to both old and new testament believers, demonstrating His consistent faithfulness throughout all times. He deals with all mankind in the same way.

While believers are justified and counted righteous through faith in Christ, they are not exempt from the ongoing struggle with their sinful flesh. Paul describes this battle against the power of sin in Romans Chapter 7. He describes the tension of having “sin living in me,” acknowledging the coexistence of the redeemed inner man and the lingering influence of sin.8 The sinful flesh is not eradicated; rather, we can consider it dead and defeated because of Christ’s work on the cross.9 Believers are called to actively starve their flesh and not gratify its desires.10 This duality within the Christian experience reveals that while the inner man delights in God’s law, believers must persistently strive to overcome their sinful inclinations. It is an ongoing journey of sanctification where the inner transformation by the Spirit is met with the arduous task of mortifying the flesh. This tension between righteousness and sinfulness in the life of a believer is often referred to as “simul justus et peccator” in Lutheran theology, which means “simultaneously justified and sinner.” This concept underscores the paradoxical nature of the Christian’s state, being both declared righteous through faith and yet still struggling with the effects of sin. In the words of the Formula of Concord, Epitome:

“We believe, teach, and confess that original sin is not a minor corruption. It is so deep a corruption of human nature that nothing healthy or uncorrupt remains in man’s body or soul, in his inward or outward powers11...This damage cannot be fully described.12 It cannot be understood by reason, but only from God’s Word. We affirm that no one but God alone can separate human nature and this corruption of human nature from each other. This will fully come to pass through death, in the blessed resurrection. At that time, our nature, which we now bear, will rise and live eternally without original sin and be separated and divided from it13 (FC Ep. I, 8-10).”

Yet, though we were by nature children of wrath, God graciously saved us and made us alive in Christ.14

As there is a paradoxical element in the Christian’s nature, so too there is a paradox that must be acknowledged when discussing the faith of the Christian and the possibility of falling away from it. This is more commonly known as election or predestination. The concept of election or predestination is the understanding that God, in His sovereign will, chooses people for salvation in Christ.15 Scripture also teaches, however, that man is entirely responsible for his damnation. In the words of the Solid Declaration, “Few receive the word and follow it. Most despise the word and will not come to the wedding.16 The cause for this contempt for the word is not God’s foreknowledge but the perverse human will (FCSD XI, 41).” Consequently, Holy Scripture is littered with calls to repent, and to guard against falling away.

These biblical teachings reflect a tension between divine sovereignty and human responsibility. On one hand, it affirms that salvation is entirely the work of God, as He alone is responsible for granting faith and securing the believer’s eternal destiny. This aligns with passages such as John 10:27-28, Romans 8:28, and Ephesians 1:3-6, which emphasize God’s role in choosing, protecting, and preserving His people. On the other hand, scripture recognizes the reality of human accountability and the potential for falling away. The paradox lies in holding these truths in tension, affirming both the divine initiative in salvation and the necessity of human response and perseverance.

The language of “losing salvation” can be misleading, as it implies misplacement rather than a deliberate choice (Cooper, 2018). It seems to suggest that it is something that happens to you rather than something for which you are responsible. While no external force can pluck believers from Christ’s hand, individuals can reject Christ and willfully apostatize themselves. Jesus lamented over Jerusalem, the Jews who were not willing to be gathered together by Christ as a hen gathers her chicks under her wing.17 As he faces death by stoning, Stephen calls his murderers stiff-necked people with uncircumcised hearts, who always resist the Holy Spirit,18 which is the cause of their faithlessness. Living in unrepentant sin can lead to the forfeiture of faith, as sin destroys faith (Cooper, 2018).19 This tension between the possibility of falling away and God’s perseverance of His people is a paradox and cannot be resolved by human reason. Neither element should be ignored in favor of the other; neither scriptural truth should be used to cancel the other out (Cooper, 2018).

The author of the letter to the Hebrews warns against falling away from the faith, emphasizing the danger of a hardened heart and turning away from God.20 He gives the examples of Israel’s rebellion and unbelief as a caution.21 Similarly, Paul warns against falling away as Hymenaeus and Alexander did.22 He warns the Galatians who were trying to be justified by the law after having believed the Gospel preached to them had fallen from grace and were cut off from Christ.23 Peter describes false teachers who lead others astray and who are destined for destruction.24 Peter affirms that both the false teachers and those led astray have fallen from the faith;25 he does not say that they did not have genuine faith to begin with.

Paul and Peter probably learned this from Jesus Himself. Peter’s epistle echoes what Jesus teaches in the parable of the sower. In Matthew 13:18-23, Jesus explains the meaning of the parable, which depicts different types of soil representing the condition of people’s hearts in receiving the Word of God. The seed that falls on rocky ground and among thorns symbolizes those who initially receive the Word with joy but later fall away due to persecution or the cares of the world. This parable illustrates that genuine believers can face obstacles or temptations that lead them astray from their faith. Paul’s language of being cut off from Christ reminds us of Jesus’ teaching that He is the vine and we Christians are the branches.26 He urges the disciples to remain in Him, lest they become like branches that have been cut off from the vine which are gathered up and thrown into the fire.

Cooper points out that the reception of the Word and the participation in the sacraments are the means by which God works in us, nurturing and sustaining our faith (Cooper, 2018). This makes sense, particularly in light of John 15. Jesus calls His disciples to remain in Him. He repeats the admonition several times. How are we to remain in Jesus? By eating His body and blood, which is real food and real drink:

“Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in them. Just as the living Father sent me and I live because of the Father, so the one who feeds on me will live because of me.27”

Through means of grace, and particularly the Sacrament of the Altar, Jesus “perseveres” His Christians, guards them against falling away, and empowers them to remain steadfast.

The Solid Declaration reflects the paradoxical nature of the biblical teaching on election and does not speculate beyond what scripture says (FCSD XI 53, 64). It acknowledges that the doctrine of election is both mysterious and profound, encompassing the tension of divine sovereignty and human responsibility. It confesses God’s choice of individuals for salvation in Christ is an act of His pure grace, independent of any merit on our part. It affirms the nature of salvation, emphasizing that God alone is responsible for granting eternal life to believers, and that this teaching about election should be a comfort to Christians (FCSD XI 45-49). At the same time, the Solid Declaration recognizes the reality of human accountability, as individuals bear responsibility for their own rejection of God’s saving grace and their resulting damnation (FCSD, XI). This understanding aligns with the paradoxical nature of election presented throughout Scripture, affirming both the sovereignty of God and the human response to His grace. From the Solid Declaration, we learn that matters such as how election works from God’s perspective should not be investigated beyond what scripture tells us, and that the teaching about election should not be considered apart from Christ:

“We neither can nor should investigate and fathom everything in this article, the great apostle Paul declares. After having argued much about this article from God’s revealed word, as soon as he comes to the point where he shows what God has reserved for His hidden wisdom about this mystery, he suppresses and cuts it off with the following words, ‘Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments and how inscrutable His ways! For who has known the mind of the Lord?’28 In other words, we cannot know about matters outside of and beyond what God has revealed in His word. This eternal election of God is to be considered in Christ, and not outside of or without Christ29 (FCSD XI 64-65).”

In conclusion, the doctrine of justification by God’s grace through faith is foundational to Christianity. Christians, though justified and regarded as righteous through Christ, continue to wrestle with their sinful flesh. The admonitions against falling away serve as sober reminders of the significance of perseverance and the perils of unrepentant sin. It is essential to embrace these paradoxical truths, recognizing the danger of apostasy while concurrently relying on God’s ongoing work of preservation through His means of grace, His Word and sacraments. The Holy Spirit works through His means of grace to strengthen and sustain the Christian in the faith. Through God’s Word by the working of the Holy Spirit, believers find assurance and steadfastness in Christ. ###


End Notes

1. Romans 3:24
2. Ephesians 2:1-10
3. Galatians 3:27
4. Galatians 5:16-17
5. Romans 6:5-10
6. Romans 4:3; Galatians 3:6
7. Galatians 3:7-9
8. Romans 7:17-25
9. Romans 6:11
10. Galatians 5:16
11. Romans 3:10-12
12. Psalm 19:12
13. Job 19:26-27; 1 Corinthians 15:53
14. Ephesians 2:3-5
15. Ephesians 1:4-5; John 10:28
16. Matthew 22:3-6
17. Matthew 23:37
18. Acts 7:51
19. 1 John 1:8-10; 3:7-10
20. Hebrews 3:12-14
21. Hebrews 6:4-6
22. 1 Timothy 1:19-20
23. Galatians 5:4
24. 2 Peter 2
25. 2 Peter 2:18, 20-22
26. John 15:1-8
27. John 6:56-57
28. Romans 11:33-34
29 Matthew 11:28; 17:5; John 10:9; 14:6; 16:14; Ephesians 1:4-6


Works Cited

McCain, P. T. (Ed.). (2005). Concordia: The Lutheran Confessions: A Reader’s Edition of the Book of Concord (Pocket Edition). Formula of Concord - Solid Declaration, XI (Election). Concordia Publishing House. https://bookofconcord.org/solid-declaration/election/

Cooper. (2018, January 31). Can a True Christian Fall Away From the Faith? Just and Sinner. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://youtu.be/qbty10eg0y

Sunday, March 26, 2023

Thoughts on Death and Resurrection in the Old Testament

C.S. Lewis, in his book “Reflections on the Psalms,” suggests that by the time of Jesus, Jewish theology had evolved to include life after death as we understand it today, as well as the concept of resurrection. Lewis wrote that previous generations of Christian theologians seem to have thought that the authors of the Psalms understood theology from a Christian perspective as we do today; that they wanted eternal joy and feared damnation. Lewis, however, does not think they had even the same concept of death as Christians.

Though he cites many portions of the Psalms to make his case, Lewis’ idea can be challenged. The idea of an afterlife and resurrection is present long before the time of Jesus’ earthly life and even before the composition of the Psalms. In fact, the belief in life after death is a central component of the entire Bible.

In the book of Daniel, the prophet writes:

“Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt” (Daniel 12:2).

This passage clearly indicates that the dead will be raised from the grave, and it suggests that there will be different fates for the righteous and the wicked.

Similarly, in the book of Job, it is written:

“I know that my redeemer lives, and that in the end he will stand on the earth. And after my skin has been destroyed, yet in my flesh I will see God” (Job 19:25-26).

Job expresses his confidence that he will see God even after his body has been destroyed. Additionally, some theologians, such as Franz Delitzsch, believe that Job is the oldest book in the Bible. If this is true, it makes Job’s confession all the more significant.

In his book, Isaiah writes:

“Your dead will live; their bodies will rise. You who dwell in the dust, wake up and shout for joy” (Isaiah 26:19).

This passage refers to the resurrection of the dead, and it is clear that the author believes in a physical resurrection.

Lewis’s thesis is further undermined by the fact that the Sadducees, whom Lewis identifies as a remnant of the older way of thinking, were a small and marginalized group in Jewish society. The Pharisees, who were the dominant group, believed in both an afterlife and a bodily resurrection. As Kretzmann notes, “The Pharisees accepted the resurrection of the dead as a fundamental tenet of the faith, and they based it on the Scriptures.” Similarly, Keil & Delitzsch declare in their commentary, “The belief in a resurrection is so firmly established in the Old Testament, that even the Sadducees could not entirely escape its influence.” The idea of the resurrection was not something that developed late in the history of Israel. It is a concept that was present in Jewish theology from an early period; from the time of Job who expected to see his redeemer after death; to Abraham who expected God to return his son Isaac to him from the dead because of God's promise (Genesis 22:1-19); and the prophets who, like Elijah, even raised the dead by the power of God.

There was certainly development in the theological understanding of God’s people. As God came to them and revealed more of His word to them by His prophets, the blurry picture they had of the one who would crush the serpent’s head and restore all things came into sharper focus over time. Rather than a development of their theology, however, one could think of this as a gradual revelation. The development was not a natural evolution through stages of philosophical complexity as Lewis seems to suggest. It was a gradual expansion of their collective understanding, meticulously directed by the Almighty and Omnipotent God who created all things. He prepared them for the day when He would Himself enter His creation to redeem it from sin, death, and the devil. As the author of the letter to the Hebrews explains, those who came before us believed, but they did not get to see the fulfillment of God's promise to send a savior. 

We, however, now fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfector of our faith, who for the joy set before Him endured the cross, scorning its shame, and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God. He is the fulfillment of all these things. He is the resurrection and the life. Because He lives, we too shall live, having been baptized into His death and His resurrection. This is the faith we have in common with all those who came before us. And we will all rise together on the Last Day.  Even though our bodies have been destroyed, in our flesh we shall see Jesus. 

Works Cited

Delitzsch, Franz. A New Commentary on Genesis, Vol. I. Translated by Sophia Taylor, T&T Clark, 1888.

Keil, Carl Friedrich, and Franz Delitzsch. Commentary on the Old Testament. Hendrickson Publishers, 2006.

Kretzmann, Paul E. Popular Commentary of the Bible. Kretzmann Project, 1921.

Lewis, C.S. Reflections on the Psalms. Mariner Books, 1958.

Friday, November 25, 2022

Thoughts on Psalm 69

You know how I am scorned, disgraced and shamed; all my enemies are before you. Scorn has broken my heart and has left me helpless; I looked for sympathy, but there was none, for comforters, but I found none. They put gall in my food and gave me vinegar for my thirst. (Psalm 69:19-21)

Psalm 69 is a messianic psalm. It prophesies of Israel's King who was to come and rescue them. It is both a prophecy and prayer of Jesus, the true savior-king of which David was a foreshadowing. This Psalm of David is rivaled only by Psalm 22 in terms of its messianic character.

In the Psalm, the Messiah cries out to God that He is stuck in the miry depths. He laments that the deep waters are engulfing Him. The imagery of mire, mud, and deep waters is used elsewhere in scripture to describe the bond of sin. (Brug, Psalms 1, 1992) It is like quicksand. It is a peril from which the man in it cannot extract himself. The more one struggles to release himself, the deeper he sinks into it until he is finally destroyed. He needs someone to pull him out.

This is just what the Messiah was supposed to do. He was supposed to come and rescue God's people. Only He didn't do it the way everybody thought He should. He did it by taking our place in the mud. But why was that necessary? When one man rescues another from drowning in quicksand he doesn't have to crawl into it and die in his place. Quite right. But when you remember that sin is like debt, a better picture of our circumstance emerges. It isn't something we can be plucked out of. It requires something of the one who would save us. When you spend too much on your credit cards so that you can't pay it back, the friend or family member who bails you out must pay the debt for you. And doesn't owing all that money that you know you can't pay back cause you to have a constant anxious feeling? A feeling like you are drowning? That is the feeling the psalmist is trying to evoke in these verses. That is the feeling of Jesus under the weight of our sin.

If you continue on through verse 5 this becomes even more true:

“You know my folly, O, God; my guilt is not hidden from you.”
This talk of the psalmist being caught up in sin, and God knowing His folly and His guilt does not seem to fit into the messianic character of this Psalm. Isn't Christ sinless? How can He be foolish? Even more, how can He say that He is drowning, being deluged by sin?

Though some theologians see these verses as evidence that this Psalm primarily refers to David, they can rightly be applied to Jesus, who is their fulfillment, as well. (Brug, Psalms 1, 1992) St. Paul wrote that the message of the cross is foolishness (folly) to those who are perishing (1 Corinthians 1:18). Jesus' folly is indeed known to God the Father. It was His will that Jesus engage in it; it is Jesus will to obey the Father. It is the folly He who Himself is sinless, being made to become sin for us on the cross so that we might become the righteousness of God (2 Corinthians 5:21). He was cursed, for as it is written, “cursed is every man who is hung on a tree” (Deuteronomy 21:23; Galatians 3:13-14). It is, therefore, quite appropriate that these words be applied to Jesus. You see, where we could not overcome sin and death, He could because He is God.

Theologians also point to verse 21 as further evidence that Psalm 69 is foremost a messianic prophecy. There is no direct parallel in David's life for, “They put gall in my food and gave me vinegar for my thirst.” These specific things do, however, happen to Jesus and are recorded in the accounts of His crucifixion – when He was hung on the tree.

Some people also have a problem with the imprecatory prayer found in verses 22-28. An imprecatory prayer is a prayer to God against one's enemies. It is asking God to punish them, to literally call evil on them. There are entire psalms which we call imprecatory psalms. Most of the time we just ignore them because they make us feel uncomfortable. I suspect it is why they were left out of our Lutheran hymnals. The reason for the difficulty is understandable. It is hard to think that Jesus would pray for His enemies to be blotted out of the book of life (v. 28).

Jesus is indeed the one who lamented over the faithlessness of Jerusalem. He wants to gather us all like a hen gathers her chicks. He wants all men to be saved and come to a knowledge of the truth. Most, like the religious leaders of Jesus' day, would not (Matthew 23:37). Those who will reject Jesus will be damned. They will be cast into hell, which was prepared for the devil and his angels, since it is their wish to push away God and flee from His presence. This is on them, not Jesus.

The last section of the Psalm (vv. 29ff.) is a prayer of deliverance and thanksgiving. Here Christ talks about how God will save Zion, His people. He prays also that God's salvation would protect Him in His pain and distress. God the Father does this by delivering Him from the grave and raising Him from the dead on the third day. By this work, Jesus saved His people, personified in the Psalm as Zion.

Zion will be saved. Her cities will be rebuilt. The land will be inhabited by the faithful, those who love the name of Jesus. The ultimate fulfillment of this prophecy will come on the Day of Judgment when Christ returns. On that day, every knee shall bow, and every tongue shall confess that Jesus is Lord, to the glory of God the Father (Daniel 7:13-14; Matthew 26:62-66; Philippians 2:10-11). ###

Works Cited

Brug, John C. People’s Bible Commentary: Psalms 1. St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 1992.

Sunday, November 20, 2022

Thoughts on Psalm 44

Awake, O Lord! Why do you sleep? Rouse yourself! Do not reject us forever. Why do you hide your face and forget our misery and oppression? We are brought down to the dust; our bodies cling to the ground. Rise up and help us; redeem us because of your unfailing love (Psalm 44:23-26).

Psalm 44 is a community lament. It is Israel recalling her past victories, and lamenting that she has been forsaken by God. Luther called it a “sighing of the spirit”.

The psalm's context is debated by theologians. It could have been written in response to some defeat of Judah during Hezekiah's time. It could be from an early period in David's life when Saul was still king. There isn't really any hard evidence for either hypothesis, though the psalmist does not specifically mention David or any of his accomplishments.

The defeats that the psalmist describes are not punishments for the faithful. They are punishments for the unfaithful; those who were idolaters; those who did not keep the covenant. For the faithful who had to endure those sufferings, they were sufferings for the sake of Yahweh. This is suffering which we are to learn patiently endure and "rejoice that you participate in the sufferings of Christ, so that you may be overjoyed when his glory is revealed," (1 Peter 4:13). It is the refiner's fire, so to speak. The faithful, suffering because of the name of Jesus, are the silver and gold being refined.

And no suffering or defeat can separate those faithful to Yahweh from Him. Paul writes this to the Romans, and he quotes this very Psalm:

"Who shall bring a charge against God’s elect? It is God who justifies. Who is he who condemns? It is Christ who died, and furthermore is also risen, who is even at the right hand of God, who also makes intercession for us. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? As it is written: 'For Your sake we are killed all day long; We are accounted as sheep for the slaughter.' Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. For I am persuaded that neither death nor life, nor angels nor principalities nor powers, nor things present nor things to come, nor height nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord." (Romans 8:33-39)

The Psalm also applies to the true Israel, the Church. Idolatry is always present with us, as it was with ancient Israel. Victory over ancient Israel's enemies was not earned by wielding the sword, but rather it was given by the grace and power of Yahweh. Likewise, victory over the ultimate enemies of sin and death is not something we can earn. It is won for us, and given to us by Jesus, Yahweh in human flesh.

Psalm 44 gives us shadows of Jesus. He was rejected for us; made to become sin for us so that we could become the righteousness of God in Him (v. 9). Christ was sold for a pittance (v. 12), betrayed by Judas for 30 pieces of silver. Christ was made a reproach; He endured scorn while hanging on the cross (v. 13-16). All these things happened to Him because it was the Father's will to redeem mankind. It was Christ's will to obey the Father, in spite of the fact that Jesus had not been false or unfaithful (v. 17-19).

Psalm 44 is a prayer of the Church as long as she is in the fallen world. It is St. John's prayer in Revelation: Come, Lord Jesus. It is the voices of those suffering for the name of Jesus: do not reject us; do not forget us; rise up and help us; redeem us. God has answered this prayer already. He has redeemed us, and that redemption belongs to us right now. Christ has won that redemption from sin, death, and the devil by dying as our substitute on the cross. We will fully realize that redemption when Jesus raises us from the dead. ###



Works Cited

Brug, John F. People’s Bible Commentary: Psalms I. St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 1992.

Reading the Psalms with Luther. St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 2007.

Friday, October 1, 2021

On Mandated COVID-19 Vaccinations

The individual rights given to man by God, and enshrined in the US Constitution should not be violated merely because a large faction of the population have given into an unreasonable fear of sickness and death. Nevertheless, we are dangerously close to seeing municipal employees, whom we hailed as heroes a year ago for continuing to work during the pandemic, be forced to choose between their consciences and their jobs. People who have a moral objection to vaccines in general, but to the COVID-19 vaccines in particular should not be forced to take them. People who have recovered from COVID-19 infection and have been shown to have antibodies present in their blood should not be forced to get vaccinated for COVID-19. Bodily autonomy and integrity should be respected; no one should be forced to receive a medical treatment against their will. Governments are instituted among men in order to secure and protect individual rights, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Forcing people to choose either between becoming vaccinated, or becoming second-class citizens is destructive of these ends.

First, people who have a conscientious objection to the COVID-19 vaccine should not be forced to take it. The three vaccines approved for use in the United States all use abortion-derived cell lines in either their development and production, or during the lab testing phases. As an evangelical Lutheran Christian, I find it morally unacceptable to receive such vaccines. Scripture teaches that babies in the womb are alive, and are human persons from the time of their conception. To end that life without moral justification is murder, and a sin against God’s command. God calls us in the the 5th Commandment not to harm our neighbor in his body, but to help and support him in every physical need. To receive the benefits of such a vaccine developed from abortion-derived cell lines, however tangentially, makes me feel complicit in that murder.

Next, People who have recovered from COVID-19 infection and are producing antibodies should not be forced to get a COVID-19 vaccine. The National Institutes of Health has found that most people who have recovered from COVID-19 infection come away from their illness with long-term immune protection from the disease. A recent study from Tel Aviv University in Israel, the country with the highest vaccination rate in the world, has determined that natural immunity to COVID-19 is “far superior to vaccine-induced immunity.” Yet, in the United States, we are treating people with natural immunity as though they pose a danger to the health of the general public, if they do not receive a vaccination. We should recognize the benefits of natural immunity through infection recovery and at least consider it to be on the same level as vaccination-induced immunity. We should not require people with natural immunity to be vaccinated.

Finally, the rights of individuals to seek out or refuse medical treatment should be respected. No one should be pressured to get a vaccination if they do not believe it is in their best interest. All the currently available COVID-19 vaccines were developed quickly and authorized for use under emergency use approval by the FDA. We have no clear idea what the long-term effects of these medicines will be on the human body. People willing to accept that risk should certainly be allowed to take the vaccine. People who do not want to take that risk, no matter how ignorant others may consider that decision to be, should not be forced to do so. Moreover, though these medications are being called vaccines, that is not truly what they are. These treatments are, in reality, therapeutics similar to the flu shot. They may not prevent a vaccinated person from contracting the disease; they may lessen the severity of the disease and its duration. While our society strongly encourages everyone to get a flu shot each year, we do not mandate it, and influenza kills tens of thousands of people every year.

Every day we seem to get a little closer to a vaccine mandate here in Hodgkins. The federal government is on the cusp of mandating companies which employ 100 or more people to require their employees to be vaccinated. Private corporations, institutions of higher education, and municipalities all over the country are instituting vaccine mandates as a condition of employment. Hodgkins’ neighbor, Countryside, has instituted such a mandate for their city employees, punishable by measures up to and including termination of employment. Mandates are being challenged in the courts all across the country. Some are being upheld, and some have been struck down. The best course of action would be to allow workers to make their own choices about the vaccines, and let them live at the level of risk at which they are comfortable. It is clear that the most reasonable compromise would be to allow exemptions to those people who have a conscientious objection to the vaccines, as well as to those who can demonstrate natural immunity through antibody testing, and to require from this group continued social distancing along with regular COVID-19 testing in lieu of forced vaccination.

Such constant testing and social distancing is itself divisive and, I suspect, useless. It could be endured as a compromise with those who are still afraid and want to retain the illusion that these superstitious measures protect them.

The general public is becoming conditioned to to believe that their friends and neighbors who choose not to get vaccinated for COVID-19 are somehow endangering the lives of those who are vaccinated. This certainly isn’t true. We should resist this misconception and respect the rights and choices of all individuals. ###


Wednesday, September 23, 2020

An Argument from Scripture for The Cessation of the Prophetic Gifts

     There are large numbers of people in modern western society who claim supernatural experiences. (Keener 2011) This should not be surprising, secular humanist skeptics notwithstanding. The issue is not whether the supernatural exists, but rather does God give prophetic (charismatic) gifts in the post-apostolic period. Prophetic gifts were present among God's people (we will use the term Church for both God's Old Testament, and His New Testament people) to varying degrees throughout biblical history. The question at hand is this: Are post-apostolic claims of tongue-speaking, prophecy, healing, and discernment of spirits legitimate? God's word tells us that those claims are not. (Judisch 1978)

Jesus says that signs and wonders would continue in the end times, but those signs would be of diabolical origin. Their purpose, according to Christ, would be to deceive. Jesus explains this to His disciples as they look at the temple from the Mount of Olives; He tells them the answers to their questions: 1) When will the temple be destroyed, and 2) what will be the signs of Christ’s return, i.e. the end of the age? (Matthew 24:1-35). About signs and wonders Jesus says, “At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or ‘There he is!’ do not believe it. For false Christs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and miracles to deceive even the elect – if that were possible. See, I have told you ahead of time.”[1]

Charismatic gifts can be broadly defined as special supernatural gifts given to men by the Holy Spirit. Charisma in the New Testament, however, refers to any gift that is freely given, including redemption. The term prophetic gifts may be a more accurate way to describe what is commonly called the charismatic gifts: speaking in tongues, prophetic utterances, miraculous healings, discerning spirits. In scripture, all these prophetic gifts are connected to prophecy. In its broadest form, prophecy may be defined from Holy Scripture as discourse in words given or taught by God, which may or may not involve predicting future events. (Judisch 1978)

It is vitally important to the Church to determine whether or not God still bestows the prophetic gifts described above on men now, during the post-apostolic end of the age. It will affect both the Church’s doctrine and practice. If modern day prophets are speaking God’s word, we must submit to their teaching. Scripture calls us, however, to contend for the faith once for all delivered to the saints.[2] How do we know what constitutes that faith if there are a constant stream of self-proclaimed prophets, claiming direct revelation from God? We must follow the same rules for judging prophecies as the Church did throughout it’s existence: we must use the external word of God as the standard.

Scripture alone must be used to judge teachings, without extra-biblical sources, including our own feelings, interpreting and adding meanings which are not present in the text. Scripture texts should be interpreted according to the plain meaning of the language, and always in context. This, of course, includes texts concerning what today are commonly called the charismatic gifts. (Judisch 1978)

 

“As soon as it was night, the brothers sent Paul and Silas away to Berea. On arriving there, they went to the Jewish synagogue. Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true. Many of the Jews believed, as did also a number of prominent Greek women and many Greek men” (Acts 17:10-12).

 

Luke gives us the positive example of the Bereans to follow when it comes to doctrine. It must always be tested against God’s authenticated word. The scriptures against which the Bereans tested Paul’s words, to see if they were given to him by God, were what we today call the Old Testament.

God warns His people through Moses not to follow lying prophets, even if they perform great signs and wonders to authenticate themselves. This may seem backwards from the stated purpose of the prophetic gifts. It makes sense, however, that during the time when the prophetic gifts were given to authenticate claims of divine authority for prophecy, the prophet’s message must be tested against God’s previously authenticated word; even Satan masquerades as an angel of light, and can perform what scripture calls lying, or false wonders. This way, God’s people would know that someone claiming to be a prophet who did signs and wonders, but who proclaimed a message that contradicted God’s previous revelation, was a false prophet; God does not lie or change.

 

If a prophet, or one who foretells by dreams, appears among you and announces to you a miraculous sign or wonder, and if the sign or wonder of which he has spoken takes place, and he says, “Let us follow other gods” (gods you have not known) “and let us worship them,” you must not listen to the words of that prophet or dreamer. The Lord your God is testing you to find out whether you love him with all your heart and with all your soul (Deut. 13:1-3).

 

The signs worked by the false prophet are signs worked by the devil. They serve God’s purposes, however, by being signs of judgment against unbelievers who would reject the words God had truly given the people in the covenant for a lie.

In the same vein, Paul writes to Timothy: “Until I come, devote yourself to the public reading of Scripture, to preaching and to teaching. Do not neglect your gift, which was given to you through a prophetic message when the body of elders laid their hands on you…Watch your life and doctrine closely. Persevere in them, because if you do, you will save both yourself and your hearers” (1 Timothy 4:13-14, 16). It is important that we teach the teachings that God gives us in Holy Scripture, rather than to just “agree to disagree”.

We have as our standard for judging doctrine the prophetic and apostolic scriptures. The scriptures of the Old and New Testament are the only true standard by which teaching, and preaching can be judged. The Old Testament scriptures are those that were preserved by God through His people Israel and recognized by Jesus and the Apostles. The New Testament scriptures are those writings which come directly from an Apostle, or were attested to by an Apostle, the Apostles themselves being validated by their possession of, and ability to confer on others, the prophetic gifts. (McCain 2005)

Before examining the question of whether or not God continues to bestow prophetic gifts, we must briefly consider how He has bestowed those gifts in the past, and what was their purpose. God can certainly do anything He chooses. If He chose to impart the prophetic gifts to a person directly today, He indeed could. God could also come to people and convert them from unbelievers into Christians spontaneously, if He chose to work that way. He has instead chosen to come to people, and to give His gifts to people, using means. He gives His gifts of repentance, faith in Christ, forgiveness of sin, life, and salvation through His word and sacraments (sacraments being physical elements, joined to God’s word and promise by God’s instruction);[3] He gave His prophetic gifts of prophecy, speaking in tongues, and healing through His Apostles. To say this is not to limit God; it is to acknowledge what God has revealed to us in His word: that He wishes to deal with us only through these means. (McCain 2005)

The Holy Spirit has two roles where the charisma are concerned: He is the creator of the gift of faith in the hearts of men, and He is the giver of prophetic gifts. Both of these gifts God has decided to give through ordinary means. Faith is given through God’s word and sacraments; the prophetic gifts are given through the means of the Apostles themselves. (Judisch 1978) Hebrews 2 connects the distribution of the prophetic gifts to the Apostles. Verses 2-3 imply that the confirmation, which we already know is the purpose of the apostle’s prophetic gifts, was a past and completed action.

 

“We must pay more careful attention, therefore, to what we have heard, so that we do not drift away. For if the message spoken by angels was binding, and every violation and disobedience received its just punishment, how shall we escape if we ignore such a great salvation? This salvation, which was first announced by the Lord, was confirmed to us by those who heard him. God also testified to it by signs, wonders and various miracles, and gifts of the Holy Spirit distributed according to his will” (Hebrews 2:1-4).

 

God’s will was to give these prophetic gifts, not immediately and directly to men of every age, but through the means of His Apostles for the purpose of confirming their message, and as signs of judgment against those who did not believe.

The account of the Samaritans who came to faith, recorded in Acts 8, demonstrates the Holy Spirit working in both capacities of giver of the gifts of repentance and faith, and giver of the prophetic gifts. The Samaritans received the Holy Spirit when they heard God’s word and were baptized, and the Holy Spirit created faith in them. They also experienced the Holy Spirit working in His capacity as giver of prophetic gifts through the Apostles. (Judisch 1978) Luke writes:

“They followed him because he had amazed them for a long time with his magic. But when they believed Philip as he preached the good news of the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women. Simon himself believed and was baptized. And he followed Philip everywhere, astonished by the great signs and miracles he saw” (Acts 8:11-13).

 

The fact that the Samaritans received the Holy Spirit is evident because scripture tells us that they believed. They did not, however, receive any prophetic gifts at that time. When Phillip evangelizes Samaria, his words are attested to as God’s words by the signs and wonders he performs; he has the prophetic gifts through the Apostles by the laying on of hands. He is not able, however, to transmit the gifts he has to others. We know this because the Apostles send apostolic delegates to Samaria to bestow on them prophetic gifts. They had to go to the Samaritans themselves because only the Apostles could transmit the prophetic gifts to others. (Judisch 1978)

 

“When the apostles in Jerusalem heard that Samaria had accepted the word of God, they sent Peter and John to them. When they arrived, they prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit, because the Holy Spirit had not yet come upon any of them; they had simply been baptized into the name of the Lord Jesus. Then Peter and John placed their hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit” (Acts 8:14-17).

 

This is an example of the Apostles, God’s means for transferring the prophetic gifts to others, bestowing those gifts on other believers as a further sign of their divine authority and the veracity of their message.

There are no examples in the New Testament of a person receiving prophetic gifts except through an Apostle. Jesus gave the gift of healing to the 70 evangelists, but this is properly considered the Old Testament era; this account does not give us an indication of how prophetic gifts would be distributed after Jesus’ death, resurrection, and ascension, during the “end of the age” in which we now live, post-Pentecost. (Judisch 1978)

While God could deal with us directly and immediately, He has chosen to deal with us through the means of His word. In like manner, the only means God established for distributing the prophetic gifts was the apostolate. Once the Apostles were dead and gone, the gifts could not be given to other people. This is a limitation God placed on Himself. We know this by the words of Jesus in Matthew 24, and Paul in 1 Corinthians 13. (Judisch 1978) We limit the Holy Spirit, not when we assert the scriptural truth that prophetic gifts have ceased, but rather when we insist that the Holy Spirit must treat post-apostolic believers in the exact same way as He treated the faithful during the time of the Apostles, and before, by giving us the exact same gifts. (Judisch 1978)

 

The Prophetic Gifts of Prophecy, Tongues, and Healing

 

As it occurs in scripture, prophecy is discourse in words taught or given by the Holy Spirit. This may or may not involve predictions of the future. Prophecy always involves men speaking words given to them by God; faithful preachers and teacher are, therefore, prophets, to some limited degree, by the biblical definition. (Judisch 1978) All the examples of charismatic (prophetic) gifts recorded in scripture serve to validate the authenticity of the prophet and his prophecy. The gifts show that the words spoken were given, or taught by, God the Holy Spirit. (Judisch 1978) It is in this way that all the prophetic gifts are connected to the gift of prophecy, i.e. speaking or proclaiming words given or taught by God. The purpose of the prophetic gifts given to the Apostles was the same as that of the signs and wonders given to all the other prophets to perform: to authenticate their message as truly from God. (Judisch 1978)

If God gives us words, which we call prophecies, we must accept them. We are warned by scripture, however, that sometimes words that are claimed to be God’s, are not. These words are to be rejected. We must, then, test all prophecies that are purported to come from God, and accept only those that pass the test. Words that were confirmed by the Apostles as authentic can be accepted as God’s word, because Jesus appointed the Apostles as infallible teachers; these words must be used as the standard for the test. The Apostles manifested prophetic gifts, including discerning spirits, as a proof of their authority. This means that all the writings of the Old and New Testaments may be relied upon as authentically God’s word. (Judisch 1978) The only legitimate test of whether prophetic gifts are genuine is the test against scripture. We cannot rely on whether the words speak well of Christ, the good character, or outward holiness of the supposed prophet, or if the words make us feel good. (Judisch 1978)

The ultimate sign of the apostolic office was the ability to give the prophetic gifts they possessed to others. This was the definitive authentication of the truth of their message and of their authority. Jesus also considered the ability to confer the gifts to others, as he did with the power to heal, as the most compelling of the authentications. (Judisch 1978) If words that are supposed to have been taught by God do not have the sanction of an Apostle as the words of Holy Scripture do, or one who was “personally authenticated as a prophet by an Apostle” they are false. No alleged modern prophetic utterance can receive such sanction, since the Apostles are dead, along with any prophets validated by them. Consequently, the book of Revelation is the summation of prophecy in scripture and the history of God’s plan of salvation for man. It is the end of true biblical prophecy. (Judisch 1978)

Finally, no prophet validated by an Apostle was ever known to have sanctioned the prophecies of another. Therefore, no post-apostolic prophecies may rightly be called God’s word, and any such prophecies must be rejected by the Church. This includes tongue-speaking, along with all the other prophetic (charismatic) gifts, as they are all vitally interconnected with prophecy. (Judisch 1978)

 

Daniel: Sealing Up Prophecy

 

As discussed previously, all of the charismatic gifts have their foundation in prophecy, which is the speaking of words taught by the Holy Spirit. Therefore, when the gift of prophecy was “sealed up” in 70 AD, and ended completely with the death of John, the other gifts of healing, tongues, and discerning spirits ended as well. (Judisch 1978)

 

“Seventy ‘sevens’ are decreed for your people and your holy city to finish transgression, to put an end to sin, to atone for wickedness, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy and to anoint the most holy. Know and understand this: From the issuing of the decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One, the ruler, comes, there will be seven ‘sevens,’ and sixty-two ‘sevens.’ It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of trouble. After the sixty-two ‘sevens,’ the Anointed One will be cut off and will have nothing. The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end will come like a flood: War will continue until the end, and desolations have been decreed. He will confirm a covenant with many for one ‘seven.’ In the middle of the ‘seven’ he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And on a wing of the temple he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him” (Daniel 9:24-27).

 

Daniel 9:24-27 explains how God’s plan of salvation plays out. Basically, Daniel shows that the Anointed One, the Messiah, would come to the rebuilt Jerusalem and temple after a long and complete (70 “weeks”) period of time, to die. The Messiah would covenant with God’s people and then die as the atonement for sin. In this way, He would bring an end to the temple sacrifice. (Judisch 1978) Jesus, the Messiah, would confirm a covenant with Israel, His Church, thus bringing the old covenant sacrificial system to an end; soon after this the end decreed for Jerusalem would be poured out on it by Titus and his legions in 70 AD. (Judisch 1978) According to Judisch, the vision and prophecy that Daniel says will cease is not his own prophetic career, nor does he refer to some other specific prophet or prophecy. The words we translate as “prophecy” and “vision” are collective nouns. They refer to prophetic knowledge, prophecy, and prophets in general. (Judisch 1978)

 

It is important to observe that hazon (vision) and nabi’(prophecy) are collective nouns, referring to prophetic vision and prophets in general…But once hazon and nabi’ be acknowledged as collective nouns, no grounds exist for restricting them to any particular kind of prophecy, whether merely messianic prophecy or even Old Testament prophecy in general. Since neither the context nor the analogy of faith requires any qualification, we must see these terms as embracing all instances of the gift of prophecy, regardless of time or circumstance. (Judisch 1978).

 

Prophets and prophetic vision were to be sealed up by the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. People who already received the gift would not necessarily lose it. There would not, however, be any further dispensation of this gift from that time forward. (Judisch 1978)

 

Zechariah Prophesies a Time Without Prophets

 

The prophet Zechariah, in chapter 13 of his book, does not pinpoint a specific date when the prophetic gifts would cease. He does, however, indicate that they would not continue indefinitely. (Judisch 1978) Zechariah connects continuing prophets and prophecy with the devil. He basically calls false prophets “prophets” in the same was that idols are called “gods” elsewhere in scripture; his use of the term is meant to ridicule the false prophets. (Judisch 1978) In the time about which he is prophesying, Zechariah says that men will recognize false prophets by the simple fact that they claim to speak words given to them by God. The mere fact that a man is prophesying will make him a false prophet. (Judisch 1978) This fits together with Jesus’ end-times warnings about false prophets performing miracles to deceive.

 

“On that day, I will banish the names of the idols from the land and they will be remembered no more,” declares the Lord Almighty. “I will remove both the prophets and the spirit of impurity from the land. And if anyone still prophesies, his father and mother, to whom he was born, will say to him, ‘You must die, because you have told lies in the Lord’s name.’ When he prophesies, his own parents will stab him. On that day every prophet will be ashamed of his prophetic vision. He will not put on a prophet’s garment of hair in order to deceive. He will say, ‘I am a farmer; the land has been my livelihood since my youth.’ If someone asks him, ‘What are these wounds on your body?’ he will answer, ‘The wounds I was given at the house of my friends.’” (Zechariah 13:2-6).

 

Zechariah says in “that time” the prophets will be ashamed of their prophetic gifts. They will not dress like prophets, so as to keep from being identified as prophets. (Judisch 1978) The wounds Zechariah describes on the bodies of the prophets, which they will lie about (see verse 6) give us insight as to the true nature of their prophetic gifts. These wounds were typical of pagan seers and prophets, who would cut their flesh and abuse their bodies to try to work themselves into an ecstatic frenzy, so that they could prophesy. It is clear that Zechariah is talking about a time when genuine prophecy would cease, and only false prophets would remain. (Judisch 1978)

Zechariah identifies the time of the cessation of prophecy as “that day”, to wit: the day of the appearance of the Lord, which inaugurates the Messianic era. This is evident from the opening verse of the chapter: “On that day a fountain will be opened to the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem, to cleanse them from sin and impurity” (Zechariah 13:1). This is the time from the birth of Jesus to the Last Day when Christ will return in Judgment. While he does not pinpoint the time exactly, Zechariah indicates that the prophetic gifts will cease “a considerable time before judgement.” (Judisch 1978)

When The Prophet about whom Moses foretold came (Christ), and the Messianic age was initiated by the outpouring of the prophetic gifts on the Apostles at Pentecost, the gifts would pass away with the Apostles; the Messianic era would be, for the majority of its duration, an age without prophets. (Judisch 1978) Zechariah’s words require the church to reject modern self-proclaimed prophets and miracle-workers. The Church must point out to these, and all people, that everything necessary for the salvation of men is contained within Holy Scripture. (Judisch 1978)

 

Tongues – A Sign of Judgment

 

Investigations into, and evaluations of modern claims of manifestations of the charismatic gifts are available from many sources. Examples of modern tongue-speaking have been evaluated by psychologists and linguists for decades; most have not been shown to be genuine languages unknown to the speaker. Instances of genuine tongue-speaking have occurred, as recorded in several well-documented cases of demonic possession. These examples, however, must be attributed to diabolical sources rather than to the Holy Spirit. (Judisch 1978) Biblical tongue-speaking is something much different than what charismatic Christians today call speaking in tongues. According to scripture, speaking in tongues is simply speaking words in a language unknown to the speaker. It is in this way that speaking in tongues is related to prophecy: the speaker is speaking words given to him by God the Holy Spirit. Prophecy, as it is commonly thought of, is different only in that the speaker is speaking in his own native, or in a learned, language. (Judisch 1978)

When a person speaks in tongues, according to the biblical standard, words are given to the speaker in an unlearned language, by a supernatural source. In the New Testament, that source is God the Holy Spirit. (Judisch 1978) Throughout Old Testament history, God used people speaking foreign tongues to judge and punish the nation of Israel. Moses wrote in Deuteronomy that, “The Lord will bring a nation against you from far away, from the ends of the earth, like an eagle swooping down, a nation whose language you will not understand…” (Deuteronomy 28:49). The prophets Isaiah and Jeremiah warned that, as God had warned in His covenant with Israel, if they continued to forsake the covenant, they would eventually be punished by those who spoke a tongue that they could not understand. The shadow of the fulfillment of this prophecy is Assyria and Babylon; the ultimate fulfillment came when Israel rejected God’s final word, Christ. They were once again forced to listen to God address them through foreign tongues. (Judisch 1978) Isaiah wrote, “Very well then, with foreign lips and strange tongues God will speak to this people…” (Isaiah 28:11). Because Israel did not keep the covenant, because they rejected God’s plain words to them, Jeremiah was given to prophesy their punishment:

 

“O house of Israel,” declares the Lord, “I am bringing a distant nation against you – an ancient and enduring nation, a people whose language you do not know, whose speech you do not understand” (Jeremiah 5:15).

 

The Apostles, who were Jews, speaking in unlearned Gentile languages signals the end of God’s special relationship with the physical nation of Israel. Jew and Gentile alike were, after Pentecost, on the same level, being called to repentance and faith in Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of their sins, in whom there is no Jew or Greek, slave or free. (Judisch 1978)

Paul says that the tongue-speaking of the apostolic age was a sign to unbelievers that God was alienated from them. In this way the prophetic gift of tongues is like Our Lord speaking in parables, which were used to veil His teachings from unbelievers. (Judisch 1978)

 

Tongues, then, are a sign, not for believers but for unbelievers; prophecy, however, is for believers, not for unbelievers. So, if the whole church comes together and everyone speaks in tongues, and some who do not understand or some unbelievers come in, will they not say that you are out of your mind? (1 Corinthians 14:22-23) …Brothers, stop thinking like children. In regard to evil be infants, but in your thinking be adults. In the Law it is written: “Through men of strange tongues and through the lips of foreigners I will speak to this people, but even then they will not listen to me,” says the Lord (1 Corinthians 14:20-21).

 

The speaking in unlearned languages in the New Testament serves, as Paul says in 1 Corinthians 14, as a sign that God’s alienation from the physical nation of Israel was complete, and He had transitioned to the Gentiles. (Judisch 1978)

The culmination of God’s rejection of physical Israel is the destruction of the temple in 70 AD. Because it served as a sign of judgment to unbelieving Jews in the post-Pentecost era, the prophetic gift of speaking in tongues was, by its nature, temporary. After the ultimate judgment, the destruction of the temple, was complete, there is no further purpose for the gift of tongues. (Judisch 1978) Jesus tells the Jews plainly of the impending rejection of the nation of Israel by God in Matthew 21: “Therefore I tell you that the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people who will produce it’s fruit” (Matthew 21:43). (Judisch 1978) And again, more ominously in Luke 21:

 

“When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is near. Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those in the city get out, and let those in the country not enter the city. For this is the time of punishment in fulfillment of all that has been written. How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! There will be great distress in the land and wrath against this people. They will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations. Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled” (Luke 21:20-24).

 

The Prophetic Gift of Healing

 

There has been mainstream media attention on healing and the “power of prayer” in recent years. Surveys of doctors and patients alike show an overwhelmingly positive attitude toward intercessory prayer to help patients recover from illnesses and manage pain. But prayer to whom? Biblical prayer is not a magical incantation people can use like a healing spell. (Keener 2011) Examples presented in the media show that a majority of Americans believe in the supernatural, much to the chagrin of David Hume, even if their Christianity is dubious, at best. (Keener 2011)

Pentecostals claim great success when it comes to miraculous healing. Keener says that, in the Pentecostal magazine, “The Evangel,” where miraculous healings are reported, maladies reported to have been healed range from sciatic nerve pain, to ulcers, to blindness, and even death. (Keener 2011) Keener reports the healing of a young boy from a skull fracture and hematoma, including neurological damage, after the parents persisted in prayer “six hours a day” for an extended period. The father was tempted to lose faith, but he “felt God speak” to him and assure him that that his child would be healed. (Keener 2011) What better way for Satan to drive a wedge between a man and his faith in Christ than to perform for him counterfeit healing miracles through the agency (or means, if you like) of a heretical teacher. He will get the healing he desires and, if he is not careful, he may take the healing as validation that the healer’s words, his doctrine, is given by God. Satan can only fool him if our hypothetical man does not heed Christ’s warning in Matthew 24.

The prophetic gift of healing is not the same thing as God healing a person, according to His will, in answer to prayer. Scripture calls us to bring our concerns and requests to the Lord in prayer. Receiving the answer to our prayer for healing, however, does not mean that God has given us the prophetic gift of healing; we should not, therefore, offer our prayer-healing services publicly for hire, or think that we are miracle workers.

 

The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with the work of Satan displayed in all kinds of counterfeit miracles, signs and wonders, and in every sort of evil that deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness (2 Thessalonians 2:9-12)…And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. It is not surprising, then, if his servants masquerade as servants of righteousness. Their end will be what their actions deserve (2 Corinthians 11:14-15).

 

Part of the masquerade is that Satan and his false apostles and false ministers will perform miracles, signs, and wonders. When those through whom the devil performed such lying wonders cry out “Lord! Lord!” on the Day of Judgment, Christ will say, “Depart from me, I never knew you.” If we allow for the possibility of the enthusiastic theological idea that God speaks and interacts with men directly and without means, we enter dangerous territory. Satan, who is the father of lies, masquerades as an angel of light; he creates false signs and wonders to deceive. What is it to Satan if he physically heals your child, but separates you from God’s word and sacraments, which are the places where God has explicitly promised to give the forgiveness of sins, life, and salvation?

 

The Prophetic Gifts in the End Times

 

The prophetic gifts served to authenticate prophets in the Old Testament, through the time of Christ. Now, in the End Times, signs and wonders such as speaking in tongues serve as signs to deceive people. Christ Himself warns His disciples to be on guard against such signs and wonders in Matthew 24. Such supernatural signs, or false prophetic gifts, are a mark of deviation from the faith. (Judisch 1978)

 

Jesus said, “At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or, ‘There he is!’ do not believe it. For false Christs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and miracles to deceive even the elect – if that were possible. See, I have told you ahead of time” (Matthew 24:23-25)…In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe (Hebrews 1:1-2).

 

The proclamation of the Gospel, as attested by the Apostles is the final stage in the revelation of God to the church on earth. (Judisch 1978) Christ Himself warns of serious consequences to those who would add to the words of “this book” (see Revelation 22:18). While He is obviously speaking of the book of His revelations to St. John, He certainly also means this warning to apply to scripture as a whole. Judisch argues that this is demonstrated in the way the revelation given to John is constructed. The tree of life calls back to Genesis; the book of Revelation is “a virtual mosaic of Old Testament allusions.” Moreover, it is the last of the words given by God, through the Spirit, to an Apostle. (Judisch 1978) Paul confirms this:

 

“Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away. For we know in part and we prophesy in part, but when perfection comes, the imperfect disappears. When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put childish ways behind me. Now we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known” (1 Corinthians 13:8-12).

 

Here, Paul concludes the famous love chapter of 1 Corinthians by telling the Corinthian church that the prophetic gifts – prophecy, tongues, and discerning spirits – will pass away. The fact that God has ended the prophetic gifts should make the Church happy and give us comfort. Judisch says that the cessation of the prophetic gifts proves that God the Father has accomplished His saving work for mankind through Jesus the Messiah. (Judisch 1978).

Various prophetic gifts have been given to men throughout biblical history, whom we call prophets, by the Holy Spirit to validate the message of the prophet. Indeed, “in the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son.”[4] But now, in Christ Jesus, the perfection has come. He is the fulfilment and culmination of Holy Scripture. And, as Paul wrote, when perfection comes, the imperfect disappears.[5] The prophetic gifts, poured out on the Apostles at Pentecost in fulfillment of the words of the prophet Joel,[6] and conferred to others by the laying on of apostolic hands, have died away in these last days because they have served their function. They are no longer necessary.

The signs and wonders of the prophetic gifts no longer serve as a validation of a prophet’s message, but as a sign that the prophet is false, and that according to Christ Himself. The canon of scripture, with the Revelation of Jesus Christ to St. John, has closed. Mankind has all that is necessary for forgiveness of sins, everlasting life, and salvation in the external word, the prophetic and apostolic scriptures, collected and preserved for us by the working of the Holy Spirit through the Church. The thing that each Christian is given to cling to, that will reassure them that they are connected to Christ and His righteousness, and that they are a child of God, is not the promise of a personal revelation or the manifestation of a prophetic gift, but rather their baptism. Holy Baptism connects us with Christ’s death and resurrection, clothes us with Christ, washes away our sins, and saves us by the resurrection of Christ. The Sacraments of Baptism and the Lord’s Supper are the preaching of the Gospel through physical means. It is in Word and Sacrament where Christ has promised us forgiveness, life, and salvation, not in signs and wonders, or personal, inward encounters with God. It isn’t that God can’t cause signs and wonders to happen. God is able to do whatever He wants to do. If He chooses to give someone the gift of healing, of speaking a language that they previously did not know, of speaking to someone directly, He can and will. The issue is that God does not want to do these things. He has made that clear to us in His Word. ###

 



Bibliography

Judisch, Douglas. 1978. An Evaluation of Claims to the Charismatic Gifts. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House.

Keener, Craig S., 2011. Miracles: The Credibility of the New Testament Accounts. Vol. 1 of 2. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic. Supernatural Claims in the Recent West.

McCain, Paul T., et. al., eds. 2005. Concordia: The Lutheran Confessions. A reader’s edition of the Book of Concord. The Formula of Concord, Solid Declaration, The Comprehensive Summary, Foundation, Rule, and Norm, 3. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House.

—. Concordia: The Lutheran Confession. A reader’s edition of the Book of Concord. The Smalcald Articles VIII 3, 7-13. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House.



[1] Matthew 24:23-25

[2] Jude 1:3

[3] Mark 16:16; John 17:20; Acts 2:38; 11:14; Romans 1:16; 10: 14, 17; 2 Corinthians 5:19; Ephesians 5: 26; 2 Timothy 2:24-26; 3:15-17; Titus 3:5; James 1:21; 1 Peter 3:21

[4] Hebrews 1:1-2

[5] 1 Corinthians 13:8-12

[6] Joel 2:28-32